| Holistic Education Network ... |
|
we create our world
through interaction with others one
way to interact meaningfully with others is by following a learning cycle
when in discussion one possible learning cycle is
|
Peter Wright is a teacher who has always preferred to create opportunities for group work rather than standing at the front of the class and delivering a lecture. Over the last few years he has been intrigued about how students talk to other and whether it is possible to help them improve their conversations. Listening to students talking in between classes he realized that a lot of the talk was at the detail level – sharing information about their weekends, people they know. Some of them particularly shared how they were feeling. Peter then became more aware of his own conversations, particularly noticing when he went away feeling deeply satisfied. In these conversations there was something more – drawing out key ideas and understanding from examples, imagining new possibilities. He realized that there was a rhythm to the whole process. Students’ normal chat rarely seemed to move beyond first base. He noticed that these stages of a conversation almost mirrored the Preferred Learning Styles developed by Julia Atkin. He wondered if he could help improve the talk by making students aware of the rhythm of good conversation – so they could apply it at any time without needing specifically designed questions to guide their discussion. So he designed a model, which integrates ideas from the Learning Style Theory with de Bono’s Six Thinking Hats. (See the handout he gives his students below.) He is currently using this model in his Year 11 Information Systems class, introducing it at the beginning of the year as a guide to discussions. Over the course of the year students practice talking together, being able to tease out concepts and issues in the course with greater rigor, breadth and depth. The model is also used as a guide to individual essay assignments, exam questions, and a major project. Examples of these are given below. The students really value the dialogical process and the skills they have gained. They have a greater appreciation and respect for each other as well as achieving better academically. |
A Model for Dialogical Inquiry |
![]() |
|
Emotional
personal empathetic response - interpersonal, feeling based or
kinesthetic. Procedural
A step by step way of learning -organised, detailed, sequential. Analytical
Direct comparison of different elements - logical, quantitative,
fact based. |
||||
![]() |
|
Red What
are some of our gut feelings, intuition or instincts? White
What information do we have? What information might we need? Yellow
What are some positives? What are some benefits? Who might benefit? How
could these benefits be grouped? Black
What are some negatives? What are the obstacles? Who could
encounter these obstacles? How could these obstacles be grouped? Green
How might we overcome the obstacles while preserving the benefits?
How could we create new solutions and benefits? Can these be realistically
achieved? How does this work in the real world? What are the links between
the groups? |
||||
![]() |
|
‘D’ for only
giving personal opinions with no back up. ‘C’ for a grasp of
appropriate details within a topic. ‘B’ for giving the
positives and negatives, feasibility of a particular idea or grouping of
details logically.
|
||||
Examples |
||||||
|
Using thinking hats for essays in computing Systems Analysis: Group Discussion For more information email: Peter Wright |
||||||
Holistic Education Network of Tasmania, Australia
www.hent.org
Free
to use for educational purposes but please acknowledge source.