|
|
Holistic Education Network ...
|
| |
Running a Community of Inquiry
Once the trigger material had been presented, the Community of Inquiry commences.
The major features of this method are:
- Ask the children what they found interesting or puzzling about the story or other
experience. Encourage them to make their comments in the form of a question. Gather
the children's questions on the board, writing the name of the child who asked each one
after the question.
- Discuss the questions in an order decided by one of a variety of methods - we might
vote for the most interesting question, try to group similar questions to see the area of
major interest, weed out the questions that have easy answers or which are impossible to
answer on the evidence we have and so on.
- Rules for the discussion can be decided by the community, either in advance or after
some experience of the community. In one class, for example, five rules were decided on
by the community before the first discussion. They were: be quiet when not speaking to
the community, only one speaker at a time, listen to the speaker, don't play about, speak
up loudly when you are the speaker.
- The teacher's role is that of a facilitator. Basically, it is to provoke and model the
moves made by experienced thinkers in their own best thinking, avoiding the
teacher's common roles as source of knowledge and instant evaluator of student
responses (the community takes on these roles). Some of the major techniques
here: the use of increased wait times, avoidance of judgmental comments, the
exhibition of teacher puzzlement, and the judicious use of questioning that signals
the cognitive moves that might usefully be made next and concentrates children's
attention on metacognition (thinking about their own thinking).
- The impact of the physical setting of a circle on the establishment of a community is
reinforced by the encouragement of participants to talk to the whole
circle, or directly to the person they are answering, rather than always through the teacher. Whilst it can be
necessary, especially with a newly established group, to insist on hands being, raised
before speaking, it is certainly an aim of the teacher to develop turn taking skills, so that
the discussion follows a more normal conversation dynamic. Deciding how far to allow a
noisy interchange to continue before insisting on one speaker at a time is one of the
teacher's major judgments.
- The teacher is a member of the community and hence has a duty to participate in the
discussion. However, traditional roles of teachers mean that any input they make will
carry greater weight than the contributions of students. Hence it is important for the
teacher to hold back in matters of fact and opinion if there is a good chance that the
students may come up with an acceptable answer with suitable encouragement or given
time. Lipman often says the teacher should be 'pedagogically strong but philosophically
self-effacing'. Of course, there are times when teacher input is just what the discussion
needs; deciding when and how to do this form part of the professional judgment of the
teacher, guided by knowledge of the group and the prior consideration of the issues
involved. It need not, however, always be in the form of a dogmatic statement.
- The teacher needs to encourage a recognition in the community that many
questions are complex and not amenable to simple, quick answers, so time has to
be provided for talking around problems. Clarification of what the problem is
must be recognised as valuable, even if no answer is found; premature closure of
questions is to be avoided.
- Children must be encouraged to take responsibility for their comments and be
prepared to defend, modify or change them as appropriate. The teacher needs to
ensure that attacks on positions are not made or seen as attacks on the holders of the
positions.
by Tim Sprod
Holistic Education Network of Tasmania, Australia
www.neat.tas.edu.au/HENT
Free
to use for educational purposes but please acknowledge source.